The Subtle Elision of Girls

2008 September 12 at 10:05 AM (2008, feminism, Gov. Sarah Palin, media)

In yesterday’s NYT, Kim Severson had an article, The Hockey Way of Life. It’s about the Palins’ eldest kid and their future son-in-law and how they played a lot of hockey, essentially. All fine and dandy, except that the summary blurb on the main page read

Hockey often keeps kids in Alaska on the straight and narrow, much the way football and basketball do in other places.

Football, basketball, and hockey keep “kids” on the straight and narrow, eh? I have a thing for rhetoric and precise speech, so I clicked through to see if the article was actually about “kids,” which come in more than one gender, or if “kids” was serving as shorthand for “boys.” Basketball and hockey can have both girls’ and boys’ teams, but I’ve never seen a girls’ football team, although there was always one or two girls on the team in my high school. Below the cut is a look at the article and how often it talks about boys while purportedly being an article on kids and children and how sports keep them “on the straight and narrow.”

WASILLA, Alaska — Like many parents here in the communities near Anchorage, Sarah Palin raised her older children in hockey rinks.

Powered on white mochas and an aerobics class or two, Ms. Palin, now the governor of Alaska and the Republican nominee for vice president, would drive to rinks at all hours, children in tow. She sometimes ran the scoreboard, let hockey players from other cities sleep on the floor of her home and got involved in the management of her eldest son’s teams.

But last Friday night, two longtime and once promising young players — Ms. Palin’s eldest, Track, and her soon to be son-in-law, Levi Johnston — were absent from the hockey arena in Wasilla as the coaches made the final cuts for the new season of the area’s elite amateur team, the Alaska Avalanche.

“older children” – can refer to both Bristol and Track, so theoretically it could mean girls, too. However, as far as I know, Bristol doesn’t play hockey.

“eldest son’s” – boy

“longtime and once promising young players” – boys

Although hockey players enjoy a reputation as rowdy partiers at many high schools, the sport often keeps children here on the straight and narrow, much the way football and basketball do in other places. When Dan Johnston sold raffle tickets for his son’s team, his sales slogan was, “Help keep the kids on the ice and off the streets.

If football dominates Friday nights in rural Texas, hockey dominates here.

Are girls allowed to play high school football in Texas? Do they have the hypercompetitive leagues, funding, support, and attention that the more affluent boys’ teams do?

“children” – implies mixed-gender group

“son’s” – boy

All of us basically raise our kids here from August to March,” said Donna Cooley, who has an out-of-town Avalanche player as a boarder and a 12-year-old son who plays. “We call the kids ‘rink rats,’ and we all miss each other when the season ends.”

“our kids” – implies mixed-gender group

“Avalanche player” – Avalanche is a boys’ team

“son” – boy

“kids ‘rink rats’” – implies mixed-gender group

Ms. Palin’s father was a popular cross-country coach. She was a high school basketball star who married Todd Palin, a high school jock who has remained an athlete as an adult. Mr. Palin is a four-time winner of the Iron Dog snowmobile race, something akin to Nascar elsewhere in terms of its local celebrity.

Wasilla’s four-year-old sports complex, where the Avalanche and other teams play, is a $15 million legacy from the days when Ms. Palin was mayor. The house that Sarah built — named after one of her best friends who died in a plane crash — was secured with a sales tax increase. And even before Track Palin was in elementary school, his parents had him on skates.

Sarah Palin – the first mention of a female athlete so far, and she played basketball, not hockey

“Track Palin” – boy

Parents with especially talented skaters or with enough money or both often do what the Palins eventually did with Track Palin: Write a check and send him to hockey development programs out of state. Housed with teammates, the boys go to local high schools and play on sponsored teams intended to attract attention from college recruiters.

“especially talented skaters” – can imply a mixed-gender group but refers to boys, given the “the boys go to local high schools…”

“There are some hockey moms who live their dream through their son,” he said. “Sarah wasn’t like that. She pretty much loved to watch her son and was engulfed with his level of play, but she let me coach.”

“son” – boy

Clearly, although the article purports to be about children and kids, what it’s really about is boys. No girls allowed. Every time it mentions kids, children, skaters, and groups that could theoretically be mixed-gender, the context clarifies that Severson and the people being quoted are actually referring to boys.

What bothers me is that talking about “kids” when you mean “boys” erases girls from the discussion. It assumes that the only kids that matter are boys; who cares what the girls are doing after school? Who cares if they’re playing sports? Who cares if they’re keeping “on the straight and narrow”? Girls don’t matter and are invisible – that’s what’s behind the rhetoric of using “kids” when you’re only talking about boys. If you’re going to talk exclusively about boys, use “boys.” If you’re going to talk about a mixed-gender group of kids, use “kids.” The two words are not synonymous. You’d never see an article that talked almost exclusively about girls using the word “kids” to refer to girls alone; “kids,” “people,” “humankind” and other words that theoretically denote a mixed-gender group of people are used to mean boys and men exclusively but never girls and women exclusively because maleness is constructed as the norm.

Words matter. Words shape thoughts and reality. Use them accurately and to say what you mean.

26 Comments

  1. Burning Prairie said,

    That is very telling. When I say “kids” I mean: a group of children, both boys and girls. And didn’t you know, only boys are “kids” and worthy of being kept off the streets. Girls are less-than kids. I guess there are no roaming gangs of girls terrorizing little Alaskan towns. /snark

  2. pizzadiavola said,

    When I say “kids” I mean: a group of children, both boys and girls.

    Me, too. It just amazes me that the entire article talks about kids kids hockey hockey kids kids what the kids do, where the kids go to hockey school, how hockey can get the kids into college, and not once do they talk about girls’ teams or girls’ athletics or girls.

  3. Ouyang Dan said,

    Being from way Northern Michigan, which w/ Lake Superior right there is pretty much like Alaska w/ more daylight (some will argue w/ me, they have never been to N. Michigan), and what many argue is the birthplace of Hockey (OK, this is really Detroit and Canada), they mean boys.

    Young boys start skating b/f they can do much else. Until I moved away after I had my own child I very rarely saw a girl on any Hockey team at any level (in fact I can not think of one). It just didn’t happen. Girls learn to figure skate and boys learn to play hockey.

    I am not an authority on every hockey team in every state, nor am I an expert on Alaskan Hockey, but I am from Sault Sainte Marie, and also Detroit. I know hockey. It rubbed me the wrong way then, and it rubs me the wrong way now (probably b/c I used to want to play). When you talk about kids as a monolithic group it indicates a mix. If they mean boys, they should say boys. Although, that wouldn’t make it less messed up.

    Do I make sense at midnight?

  4. bleh said,

    Don’t we know that boys = human, and girls = afterthought (if at all). Gross, gross, gross.

  5. Anne Onne said,

    Spot on. :)

    There’s a lot of that going around the media, especially if it’s talking about crime (not strictly related, but relevant). I find that if a girl or woman is responsible for some crime, especially an act of violence, her gender gets a mention, e.g. ‘teenage girl stabs best friend’, whereas a man or boy is more likely to be referred to as just a teenager e.g ‘teenager stabs best friend’ or otherwise have their gender masked by a neutral word. The assumption that they are male is there, and that’s problematic in it’s own way. But the masking of the gender of people causing problems in this respect is relevant, because it is underpinned by the aggressive machismo obsession society has, which is a remnant of the patriarchy.

    But back to the topic in your post. Sports and getting girls to play are an issue. The fact that ‘children’, a gender neutral term is used to refer to what is in reality just boys does camouflage the sexist nature of the sports establishment and a lot of people. It pretends that all childen have access to sport, or are encouraged to play, and are treated equally, whilst in reality girls are ignored or sidelined. It’s like the ‘colourblind’ race philosophy: if you can’t acknowledge that there are not many girls in sport/interested in sport, you can’t work out WHY this is happening (clue: begins with the letter M, S or P) then you can’t deal with it and make the sports world a fairer, more inviting place for girls.

    It also reinforces the notion that boys/men are the default, and girls/women the other. Bad bad BAD.

  6. gidget commando said,

    In Massachusetts (at least in the Boston-area towns I know a bit), it’s not wildly unusual for girls to have hockey teams. A few high school and college female hockey teams have gone to championships, IIRC. The sports’s still dominated by boys, however, and that’s too bad. With a lower center of gravity than the average male, you can deliver a punishing hip check (not like it’s exactly allowed in school-aged hockey, but hey, a girl can dream, can’t she?)…

  7. Devon said,

    Maybe if the girls had more activities the teen pregnancy rate would go down.

  8. pizzadiavola said,

    I very rarely saw a girl on any Hockey team at any level (in fact I can not think of one). It just didn’t happen. Girls learn to figure skate and boys learn to play hockey.

    That makes me really sad. Nothing wrong with girls who want to figure skate figure skating and boys who want to play hockey playing hockey, but the lack of freedom for kids to make their decisions without gender-based constraints.

  9. pizzadiavola said,

    bleh | 2008 September 15 at 10:26 am

    If we didn’t know already, the mainstream media certainly does its damnedest to hammer that point in.

  10. pizzadiavola said,

    It pretends that all childen have access to sport, or are encouraged to play, and are treated equally, whilst in reality girls are ignored or sidelined. It’s like the ‘colourblind’ race philosophy: if you can’t acknowledge that there are not many girls in sport/interested in sport, you can’t work out WHY this is happening (clue: begins with the letter M, S or P) then you can’t deal with it and make the sports world a fairer, more inviting place for girls.

    That’s a good point. Title IX helped a great deal with sports at high schools and colleges receiving federal funds, but in community and little league-type sports teams, there’s no guarantee of equal support for girls’ teams as boys’ teams. Talking about “kids” makes it seem that hey, girls have sports teams/support/facilities, too, when really, they don’t, which makes it difficult to raise support for them.

  11. pizzadiavola said,

    In Massachusetts (at least in the Boston-area towns I know a bit), it’s not wildly unusual for girls to have hockey teams.

    Good to hear! I was hoping that that would be the case in this article, too, but alas. I could have excused Severson for focusing so much on boys, since the article’s a thinly veiled human interest article on Track Palin and Levi Whatshisname, except that Severson and the people she quotes consistently frame it as being about how hockey is about kids and how hockey is a big part of kids’ lives in AK.

  12. pizzadiavola said,

    Devon | 2008 September 15 at 11:18 am

    Given that the boys mentioned in the article have plenty of activities, I doubt it. Unless you think that girls are spontaneously getting pregnant all on their own!

    Comprehensive, accurate sex education would decrease the teen pregnancy rate.

  13. Renee said,

    We actually have a girls football league here but it ends at 12. You are right when you state that children stands for boys and that is something that we as women should be critical of.

  14. ginmar said,

    Sarah Palin typically introduces her daughters by name only and then talks at length about her sons. This is no aberration.

  15. pizzadiavola said,

    We actually have a girls football league here but it ends at 12.

    On the one hand, I’m glad that there’s a girls football league, especially for younger girls. When we were younger, I had swim team…my brother, on the other hand, got to try baseball, soccer, football, etc. – there were so many more options for little boys than for little girls. On the other hand, it doesn’t make sense to me to cut it off at 12, unless girls have the option of continuing on a high school team.

  16. pizzadiavola said,

    ginmar | 2008 September 15 at 12:05 pm

    That explains the Sarah Palin raised her older children in hockey rinks line in the article, then. Palin talks about her “older children” but what she really means is her oldest son. Lauredhel had that post comparing the amount of time Palin spends talking about her sons versus her daughters, but I hadn’t made the connection between that and the NYT article.

  17. ginmar said,

    God, don’t you wonder what it must be like being her daughter? Reminds me of this really old guy I talked to in Iraq: “I have four children.”

    Come to find out it was eight. I asked him why he’d left out the four girls. They were nothing. Sarah Palin might not kill her daughters outright, but, damn, the way she talks about them….”This is Bristol, now let me talk about my brave son Track, who’s a soldier and who’s going to Iraq blah blah blah blah….”

    I bet she holds women in contempt and that includes her daughters. She’s the special one. Boy, what if one of them competed with her? That would be just terrible.

  18. pizzadiavola said,

    Come to find out it was eight.

    That’s terrible. While growing up, I had enough cultural issues about being a girl (the oldest child ought to be a son, girls are worth less than boys, etc.), even though my parents treated my younger brother and me fairly equally. I can’t imagine how horrible it must be to have one’s own parents ignore and dismiss their daughters for their gender.

    I bet she holds women in contempt and that includes her daughters.

    Basically. She’s like Coulter and Schlafly and the rest – they think they’re special women who can become one of the men if they hate other women enough. It’s all in her ticket’s anti-choice, anti-equal pay, anti-woman platform.

  19. VXM said,

    Ouyang Dan:

    I just thought you should know that the times they have been a changin’ in the Upper Peninsula. Girls are playing hockey. NMU and Tech have women’s club teams that travel at least around the rest of the state. Is it the same as men’s hockey? Is there the same support that there is for girls to play at a young age. Hardly. But we’ve got our skates in the door.

    Even twelve years ago (longer for the adult women’s team), there were three women’s teams associated with the local hockey league. I played for Marquette’s high-school-aged team for two years, and in college (MSU) for another two. Several girls in our league back in high school received college scholarships for hockey out east, where a number of smaller schools have competitive women’s teams.

  20. NWHiker said,

    That explains the Sarah Palin raised her older children in hockey rinks line in the article, then. Palin talks about her “older children” but what she really means is her oldest son.

    Actually, she probably raised Bristol there too… not playing, of course, but hanging out. My eldest, age 11 as of yesterday :-), is a gymnast (not my choice…) and her brother and sister spend more time in the gym than I care to admit. Quite a few of the girls’ siblings are being raised at the gym… not competing, but just hanging out there, getting to know the other siblings etc.

    Not that this article and Palin’s words, are not sexist, but younger sibs do often bear the brunt of an older’s sports choices… I except all hell to break loose when my second child -boy- decides that he no longer wants to do gymnastics (he’s in a non competitive program) and wants to take, oh, I dunno… something else. I have no idea how I’ll manage time.

  21. pizzadiavola said,

    But we’ve got our skates in the door.

    Glad to hear it! As with the 12-and-under football league that Renee mentioned above, while there’s still a huge gap between support for girls’ and boys’ sports teams, it’s something. It’s progress.

  22. pizzadiavola said,

    Actually, she probably raised Bristol there too… not playing, of course, but hanging out. My eldest, age 11 as of yesterday :-), is a gymnast (not my choice…) and her brother and sister spend more time in the gym than I care to admit. Quite a few of the girls’ siblings are being raised at the gym… not competing, but just hanging out there, getting to know the other siblings etc.

    Happy birthday to your daughter!

    It’s true that Bristol and the other Palin kids probably spent time hanging around at the rink, but the NYT article talks about the “kids” playing hockey, not just sitting in the bleachers, playing with each other, etc. For Severson to say that Palin raised her kids at the rink and for Cooley to talk about the kids being “rink rats” as if all their kids are engaged in hockey when only their sons are, is misleading and hides the reality that it’s only boys who get to play. Yes, both daughters and sons are at the rink — but sons get to play and daughters get to watch. It’s like saying both Dilbert and Pointy-Haired Boss are office workers. The statement’s technically true but hides big differences between what Dilbert and Pointy-Haired Boss do, their relative authority, and presumably how much they’re paid.

  23. NWHiker said,

    Yeah, I agree with you. I guess I was trying to say that part of ‘raised the kids at the rink’ could just be shorthanded for “none of the other kids in the family have a life, they all just hang out at big brother’s hockey games and practice”.

    It doesn’t change the fact that the reality sucks, just that I don’t think that they were trying to obfuscate the fact that the reality sucks, it’s just their sucky reality. Does that make sense?

    The NYT should have been more clear, regardless!

    And thanks for the birthday wishes… she’s at gym, now… but the other two are home and playing outside! ;>

  24. Kim said,

    It’s pretty sad that the local culture in Alaska keeps the girls out of the game (if that is the correct impression to take out of the article vs. an uninformed writer just not looking out for the girls). The USA Hockey establishment does work to promote the sport for women and girls, we have quite a few very strong college programs, and the national women’s team rocks (they won World’s this year). In my area hundreds of teen and adult women play the game at a variety of levels, from beginner’s leagues to competitive travel teams, both women-only and coed. It’s been exciting for me, as an adult recreational player, to go back to my hometown (a Wasilla-sized town in Wisconsin), and see that they now have competitive girls’ teams in a couple of age brackets.

  25. pizzadiavola said,

    It doesn’t change the fact that the reality sucks, just that I don’t think that they were trying to obfuscate the fact that the reality sucks, it’s just their sucky reality. Does that make sense?

    The reality sucks and I think you’re right in that they weren’t trying to deliberately obfuscate that – I think that they didn’t think about it at all, and that’s what I was trying to point out in the post. The way they talk and perceive things is unintentionally sexist and expresses an (un)conscious bias in how many people think about which bodies matter. Saying “kids” when you mean “boys” is the same kind of thought that Ginmar described about the man with “four children,” although less extreme.

  26. pizzadiavola said,

    It’s pretty sad that the local culture in Alaska keeps the girls out of the game (if that is the correct impression to take out of the article vs. an uninformed writer just not looking out for the girls)

    I’m not sure how much support there is for girls’ hockey in AK, as Severson didn’t talk about that at all. Given what you say about the USA hockey establishment’s efforts to promote girls’ and womens’ participation (yay!), I find it even more disappointing that Severson just ignored them altogether.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.